Gary Mckinnon

Gary is the guy who went into the computers of The Pentagon and NASA where he discovered documents about UFO's, government and military contacts with extraterrestrials and documents about free energy that have been kept from the general public, which allows the governments, banks and oil barons to perpetuate the serfdom of the public.

Oddly the Disclosure Project never once mentions McKinnon in its site, although it claims to disclose de-classified and classified information concerning extraterrestrial contacts and related covert operations by the governments and intelligence communities. Until they provide convincing evidence why they have not worked with Mckinnon, I will read their publications with skepticism.

Meanwhile express your support to McKinnon here and if you're a UK citizen, write your MP expressing you want McKinnon to be freed.

Gary faces a 60 year imprisonment charge in a US jail for breaking in to the Pentagon and NASA computers. He never damaged any of them (though he is falsely accused of causing 5,000 USD damage to each of them) and the British government does not seem prepared to protect its citizen, while no US citizen can be extradited to any country in the world. What Gary wanted to achieve is to have the free energy available to everyone that is now paying dearly for the energy provided by the corrupt oil barons of this world.

Now Nick Clegg, the spineless, twirling lackey of the corrupt US government seems to be going back on his words after previously having said: "I believe that it would be best for Gary McKinnon to be tried here. " We've known for a long time that politicians are just puppets on a stage, but Mr. Clegg has created a class of his own.

Then again...

Referring to my cautiously positive discernment of Barack Obama concerning his proposal to reduce Wall Street's power, one has to bear in mind that there were neo-cons (Rockefeller) contributing to Obama's campaign, while the Goldman Sachs Bank is a Rothschild branch. It could well be that it is just one battle in the war that is taking place behind the scenes between opposing factions of the elite.

The world has been supporting what seemed to be just causes - like Woman's Lib - that was presented to society as a movement to give women equal rights as men. A cause no one in his right mind could oppose. But Woman's Lib was funded by the Rockefellers, because they were unable to tax half the population and when women started working they got control over their children that they had to trust to day care, which put the child's education in the hands of people outside the families.

If the commissions resulting from the legislation proposed by Obama will go after neo-con controlled bankers and traders as well, we will know if Obama has made a decision on this matter that is in the interest of the American people.

A different kind of Wall Street crash

While the European Banks and exchanges are still allowed to continue their traditional, legalized plundering strategies, Obama has made a start to limit the commissions of Wall Street operators. The US administration has initiated a series of measures that intend to reduce back room deals and make the banking system as a whole more transparent.

Has one of the world leaders finally seen the light? It is still not clear how effective the proposed legislation will be, but at least a change in policy has been made. Change, which has been Obama's credo during the election campaigns may occur at last. Although the largest chunk of his campaign funding was said to come from private donations, a considerable sum was donated by banks - Lehman Brothers ($ 318,647), Morgan Stanley ($ 259,876), JP Morgan Chase ($ 362,207), Citigroup ($ 358,054), Goldman Sachs ($ 571,330) and UBS AG ($ 364,806).

Obama's legislation change will probably not be beneficial to their operations, because it may expose them for what they are: clandestine deals. Obama earned himself a place in history by going after one of his campaign funders (Goldman Sachs). JFK earned himself a magical bullet for doing something of a similar order. Beside the banks there were influential personas (Soros, Brzezinski etc.) living way above middle class standards, who were contributing in various ways to Obama's journey to the White House. The change might be harmful to their business too.

Then there is the ongoing matter of Obama's nationality which will determine if his presidency is legal or not. The verdict may affect his decisions as a president if the court resolves he is not entitled to be in office. But before jumping to conclusions, I am curious to see what will result from his intention to reduce the banks' and Wall Street's power.

Budget cutting galore

Election campaigns begin to flare-up in The Netherlands today. Budget cuts are the main focus of all political parties, regardless of their signature. They are presented to the people as necessary measures to survive the crisis. Few seem to make an effort of figuring out if taking away money from flecks of society is a proper remedy against the misery the crisis brings on. One would have to understand the true cause of the crisis to be able to fight it successfully. Referring to the counter productive measures the central banks are taking (as mentioned in my previous blog post), there is little reason to suspect that the responsible organizations are going to do well in turning around the global economic mishap.

If administrations extract money from society, corporations and organizations, including its own budget while the banks are ordering more bank notes to be printed, there is bound to be an excess amount of money that will have to go 'somewhere'. Ever wonder who is in charge of somewhere?

It is common knowledge that one can not do a lot when there is no money available. Budget cutting is crippling the victims of the edict. An often heard would-be argument is that the money will be put aside for when the crisis gets worse and boost recovery for when it will become a thing of the past. Well, the banks' crisis management does not seem to be devised to putting an end to the crisis any time soon and governments have already more than sufficiently proven that few useful things have been done in the past with the money they splayed from society.

So, what would be the true reason of the announced budget costs? Who will benefit from them? And what effect should it have to the way you cast your vote?

Logic in 2010

The Deutsche Bank is considering printing more money and the French Central Bank is thinking about selling a large measure of its gold bullions. Allegedly to fight the crisis. If increasing inflation would be a proper cure for it, these plans would make a lot of sense. Not too long ago the FRB's president suggested to print money and drop it from helicopters over the big cities in the US. This proposal earned Ben Bernanke the nickname 'Helicopter Ben'.

It looks like a special type of logic is applied in the upper echelons of corporate society. Or perhaps I should paraphrase the late, great Zappa here: Logic isn't dead! It just smells funny.

Event Horizon

How soon will soon become a thing of the past?
And future not a time always moving too fast?
When will never ever last?
And fear be put to rest?

2012 Event Horizon - Part 1

2012 Event Horizon - Part 2

2012 Event Horizon - Part 3

2012 Event Horizon - Part 4

Think twice

Many people owning capital started to wonder about safe ways to invest their money since the crisis has exposed the vulnerability of the banking system. Alternatives heavily promoted, are investments in gold, silver and platinum. Not the numismatic collections, but the bullion type. However, recently there have been disturbing articles concerning fake gold bars that are in fact made of tungsten that is covered with a gold layer. Tungsten's density is similar to that of gold – 19.25 against 19.30 – which makes distinguishing between real and fake gold bars extremely difficult. The fraud has been exposed on German Television station ProSieben.

It is disturbing to say the least, that commodity exchanges have so far disclaimed responsibility for the gold's purity they trade and have managed to get away with that. While gold plated tungsten bars continue to be found around the world they may be forced to change their policies nevertheless. The global nature of the fraud may indicate that a number of established players in the gold markets have been involved in this well planned operation for a significant period of time.

In April 2004 the House of Rothschild withdrew from the gold market. At the time no one had seen that move coming. But the contours of a global scam is becoming clear since fake gold bars have been discovered. The Rothschilds did not wish to see their name linked to illegal activities. They must have known about the fraud, because there is hardly a party to be found that is better informed concerning the gold trade than they are. They control the world's financial and gold markets.

There has always been a direct correlation between currency and gold, even after Nixon decided to unilaterally abandon the Bretton Woods system. The Federal Reserve Bank has been printing money that is not backed by any precious commodity, which basically deteriorates the value of money. The FRB's president Ben Shalom Bernanke's nickname is Helicopter Ben for a reason since he proposed to print currency and drop it from a helicopter over populated areas. It is mind boggling that so called experts tried to explain the reason of this absurd proposal.

In order to cover up the gold fraud it makes sense that more gold had to be present to back up the currency that has been printed, even if fake gold bars had to be produced to hide this illegal action. Since the banks' reports are available almost exclusively within their own ranks it is difficult to check whether gold at some point suddenly appeared out of thin air. The US congress that has been appointed by law to perform this task has never done this, probably because many members of congress are employed by banks.

If the banks keep fake gold in their vaults and the FRB continues to print worthless money while Congress does not make a serious effort of fulfilling their task of supervising currency emission, the financial market may be likely be facing problems that are difficult to resolve. So if you are considering to convert some of your capital in gold bullions, think twice. In any event, dollars will not keep your capital in good shape.

Interesting question is: where has the gold gone? I wondered about this in my previous blog entry. A relatively small measure of gold is required to gold plate tungsten bars, even if large quantities of fake gold bullions would be circulating. If the fraud would appear to have significant dimensions, it would leave enough gold which whereabouts is currently unaccounted for. To some gold is not just the precious metal that backs up currency, just as alchemists' main interest is not converting lead into gold. Where is the gold?