I've been reading the line in the title several times in discussions focusing on the saving of humanity by higher universal forces. But there's something weird to it; it's like asking a person who is drowning: 'Are you ready to be saved yet?' Especially since higher universal forces are commonly suspected (or hoped to be anyway) to be compassionate.
If, besides being intelligent beyond our grasp, they're also loving and caring beings, saying 'Humanity isn't ready yet' makes no sense when pondering the question why so much misery is an integral part of so many lives on this planet. The deeper man is cast into trouble the more limited his options become to reach the required level of being ready to be saved. It leads to utter despair instead of the solution for his current situation. Which is probably an intentionally induced mindset to worsen his fate, because it provokes an increasing measure of negative thought. Demanding victims to be ready to be saved, is simply utterly absurd.
An other matter that I suspect to be related to the above is the intentionally created fear of death, that many probably think is the end of the road, no matter how many arguments religions offer to believe the opposite is true. It also causes many to strive to complete whatever they think is important to do in this life. If such plans are carried out it is considered to be a success and if not the plan has failed often burdening following generations to continue the plan.
But for some reason that I find impossible to explain with unquestionable proof, I believe that our souls are immortal and that all souls are one. The big bang is an accurate interpretation of universal history - perhaps not in a scientific sense, but as a conceptual perception. It scattered everything. The results of this fragmentation is that each separate part is weaker, more vulnerable than the original whole. The parts can also disagree, fight and murder other parts - quite similar to what we see taking place around us now.
If the knowledge of the whole would be accessible to the separate parts, their views would be entirely different. There would be no conflict, no hate, no negativity. But complete knowledge can only be accessible to the whole. It would probably kill the fragmented parts to know all there is to know, similar to the story of Billy Doo, a young indigenous Papuan boy who was taken from rural New-Guinea to modern day Australian society and died from not being able to cope with the change from being transferred from the stone age into modern society within a flash.
To summarize my point: if we are immortal and can be gradually allowed to become familiarized with more information (that is stripped of disinformation, incarceration, abuse and exploitation), even if we cross many borders of death, we basically have all the time we need to gain the knowledge and wisdom of the whole. There is no rush, no need to hurry or finish whatever we think or feel we need to do before we die. Death isn't the end or something we need to be afraid of.
We have all the time in the universe to become the one we need to be, the one we once were. In other words: We will be ready in time when we are, but from an entirely different perspective than what we are currently made to believe.
